AMBA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Marvell Technology has a net margin of -28.33% compared to Ambarella's net margin of 9.39%. Ambarella's return on equity of -18.54% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -3.57%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $76.47, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $89.24 which suggests that it could grow by 26.07%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than Marvell Technology, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than Marvell Technology.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.759, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.9%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $85.9M, which are smaller than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Ambarella's net income of -$24.3M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $177.9M. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 6.79x versus 9.45x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NetApp has a net margin of -28.33% compared to Ambarella's net margin of 19.63%. Ambarella's return on equity of -18.54% beat NetApp's return on equity of 118.55%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $76.47, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand NetApp has an analysts' consensus of $114.52 which suggests that it could grow by 9.83%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than NetApp, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than NetApp.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NetApp has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.751%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NetApp offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp pays out 35.75% of its earnings as a dividend. NetApp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $85.9M, which are smaller than NetApp quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Ambarella's net income of -$24.3M is lower than NetApp's net income of $340M. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NetApp's PE ratio is 18.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 6.79x versus 3.32x for NetApp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -28.33% compared to Ambarella's net margin of 42.61%. Ambarella's return on equity of -18.54% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 114.12%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $76.47, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.60 which suggests that it could grow by 19.72%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 2.121, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.079%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $85.9M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $44.1B. Ambarella's net income of -$24.3M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $18.8B. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 46.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 6.79x versus 24.01x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of -28.33% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -0.61%. Ambarella's return on equity of -18.54% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -2.69%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $76.47, signalling upside risk potential of 48.29%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $309.35 which suggests that it could grow by 2.12%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than Zscaler.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.93% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 1.092, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.202%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $85.9M, which are smaller than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $678M. Ambarella's net income of -$24.3M is lower than Zscaler's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 6.79x versus 18.22x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.